Follow @travisleroy Super Collider Blog
quantizedconfusion:

Diary of a WIMPy Particle…
Four fundamental forces rule the universe: The “weak” and “strong” nuclear forces, gravity, and electromagnetism.
Everybody knows about gravity. We are all affected by it. In fact, if it has mass, it is affected by gravity. And gravity causes matter to behave in predictable ways. Here on Earth, this means when we throw something into the air, it comes back down. In space, this means less massive objects are drawn towards more massive ones.
Astrophysicists can determine a lot about the universe from gravity. They can estimate how different masses in the universe behave, and they can use those predictions to see how they affect phenomena around them. For the most part, their predictions were accurate, and mass was being affected by gravity just as expected. But, to their shock, they began to encounter problems.
The masses of stars were slightly off. Gravity was behaving as though more mass was present than there supposedly should have been. There were discrepancies in temperatures, velocities, and other physical phenomena. Scientists were baffled—and they found that the universe contains five times more mass than they thought.
But how could we overlook more than eighty percent of the mass in the universe?
And thus was born the theory of dark matter. We can’t see dark matter, because it’s not affected by electromagnetism (EM). This means it doesn’t emit light or any other forms of EM radiation that we can usually measure. There are also theories as to what sort of subatomic particle this dark matter is comprised of. A popular theory suspects they are “weakly interacting massive particles”—or WIMPs. As their name suggests, WIMPs interact only via gravity and the weak force. To draw a comparison, they have similar properties to a neutrino, except with much more mass.
It is this neutrino comparison which motivates physicists  to model the behavior of WIMPs after certain interactions that neutrinos undergo. A theoretical phenomenon known as “neutrinoless double-beta (0νββ) decay” assumes that the two neutrinos that enter into the reaction are capable of being their own “anti” particle. In other words, these two neutrinos will eventually end up annihilating each other. (Consider a particle and antiparticle to be the numbers 1 and -1. If you add them together, you get zero.)
Experiments to prove that 0νββ decay truly exists are continuously underway, and also becoming more precise. The ability to successfully conduct and refine this reaction would reveal a great deal of information about the properties and behavior of neutrinos.
In the context of WIMPs—the idea is to take this 0νββ decay model and set “bounds” that tailor it to the slightly different criteria of these dark matter particles—which could, in theory, allow them to detect their existence. In fact, their research claims that this model may be one of the most successful and accurate methods of detecting dark matter.
In this model, the incoming WIMPs (or neutrinos) would start off with different amounts of energy, depending on its speed, and whether it’s in an “excited” state. They also have a “spin” which describes its angular momentum—a bit like pretending the particle is spinning in a certain direction, depending on its spin number. Particles with different spin numbers will interact differently.
These initial characteristics are crucial in predicting how the particles will behave, what the process of the decay will be, and how long it will take. It is important that scientists are absolutely sure of what they are looking for, both in terms of how the particles will behave, as well as their numerical calculations. This ensures the likelihood of not only finding what they are looking for, but actually knowing when they’ve found it. One of the most difficult hurdles in detecting WIMPs (and science in general) is ruling out “background noise” and anomalous occurrences that are inevitably detected, and deciding if what you found is what you’re looking for.
The ability to understand and predict the behavior of this mysterious dark matter will reveal volumes, not only about the universe at large—how it came to exist, how it will continue to behave—but also about the physics of our own daily reality. Dark matter is everywhere—dark matter is right in front of you! There is no doubt it has an impact, and perhaps it is possible to use it to our advantage. But before we can even consider that, we first need to be able to find it.

[1] H. An, M. Pospelov, and J. Pradler, Physical Review Letters 109, 251302 (2012).

quantizedconfusion:

Diary of a WIMPy Particle…

Four fundamental forces rule the universe: The “weak” and “strong” nuclear forces, gravity, and electromagnetism.

Everybody knows about gravity. We are all affected by it. In fact, if it has mass, it is affected by gravity. And gravity causes matter to behave in predictable ways. Here on Earth, this means when we throw something into the air, it comes back down. In space, this means less massive objects are drawn towards more massive ones.

Astrophysicists can determine a lot about the universe from gravity. They can estimate how different masses in the universe behave, and they can use those predictions to see how they affect phenomena around them. For the most part, their predictions were accurate, and mass was being affected by gravity just as expected. But, to their shock, they began to encounter problems.

The masses of stars were slightly off. Gravity was behaving as though more mass was present than there supposedly should have been. There were discrepancies in temperatures, velocities, and other physical phenomena. Scientists were baffled—and they found that the universe contains five times more mass than they thought.

But how could we overlook more than eighty percent of the mass in the universe?

And thus was born the theory of dark matter. We can’t see dark matter, because it’s not affected by electromagnetism (EM). This means it doesn’t emit light or any other forms of EM radiation that we can usually measure. There are also theories as to what sort of subatomic particle this dark matter is comprised of. A popular theory suspects they are “weakly interacting massive particles”—or WIMPs. As their name suggests, WIMPs interact only via gravity and the weak force. To draw a comparison, they have similar properties to a neutrino, except with much more mass.

It is this neutrino comparison which motivates physicists to model the behavior of WIMPs after certain interactions that neutrinos undergo. A theoretical phenomenon known as “neutrinoless double-beta (0νββ) decay” assumes that the two neutrinos that enter into the reaction are capable of being their own “anti” particle. In other words, these two neutrinos will eventually end up annihilating each other. (Consider a particle and antiparticle to be the numbers 1 and -1. If you add them together, you get zero.)

Experiments to prove that 0νββ decay truly exists are continuously underway, and also becoming more precise. The ability to successfully conduct and refine this reaction would reveal a great deal of information about the properties and behavior of neutrinos.

In the context of WIMPs—the idea is to take this 0νββ decay model and set “bounds” that tailor it to the slightly different criteria of these dark matter particles—which could, in theory, allow them to detect their existence. In fact, their research claims that this model may be one of the most successful and accurate methods of detecting dark matter.

In this model, the incoming WIMPs (or neutrinos) would start off with different amounts of energy, depending on its speed, and whether it’s in an “excited” state. They also have a “spin” which describes its angular momentum—a bit like pretending the particle is spinning in a certain direction, depending on its spin number. Particles with different spin numbers will interact differently.

These initial characteristics are crucial in predicting how the particles will behave, what the process of the decay will be, and how long it will take. It is important that scientists are absolutely sure of what they are looking for, both in terms of how the particles will behave, as well as their numerical calculations. This ensures the likelihood of not only finding what they are looking for, but actually knowing when they’ve found it. One of the most difficult hurdles in detecting WIMPs (and science in general) is ruling out “background noise” and anomalous occurrences that are inevitably detected, and deciding if what you found is what you’re looking for.

The ability to understand and predict the behavior of this mysterious dark matter will reveal volumes, not only about the universe at large—how it came to exist, how it will continue to behave—but also about the physics of our own daily reality. Dark matter is everywhere—dark matter is right in front of you! There is no doubt it has an impact, and perhaps it is possible to use it to our advantage. But before we can even consider that, we first need to be able to find it.


“The gorgeous Orion Nebula is home to tens of what could be fledgling planetary systems. In this image, six of these modest “smudges” with big potential are highlighted (from top down): 132-1832, 206-446, 180-331, 106-417, 231-838 and 181-825.
Within the awe-inspiring, gaseous folds of Orion, researchers have identified two different types of discs around young and forming stars: those that lie close to the brightest star in the cluster (Theta 1 Orionis C) and those farther away from it. This bright star heats up the gas in the nearby discs, causing them to shine brightly. The discs that are farther away do not receive enough of the energetic radiation from the star to set the gas ablaze; thus, they can only be detected as a dark silhouette against the background of the bright nebula, as the dust that surrounds these discs absorbs background visible light. In these silhouetted discs, astronomers are better able to study the properties of the dust grains that are thought to bind together and possibly form planets like our own.
The brighter discs are indicated by a glowing cusp in the excited material and facing the bright star, but which we see at a random orientation within the nebula, so some appear edge on, and others face on, for instance. Other interesting features enhance the look of these captivating objects, such as emerging jets of matter and shock waves. The dramatic shock waves are formed when the stellar wind from the nearby massive star collides with the gas in the nebula, sculpting boomerang shapes or arrows or even, in the case of 181-825, a space jellyfish!”
Credit:
NASA, ESA, M. Robberto (Space Telescope Science Institute/ESA), the Hubble Space Telescope Orion Treasury Project Team and L. Ricci (ESO)

The gorgeous Orion Nebula is home to tens of what could be fledgling planetary systems. In this image, six of these modest “smudges” with big potential are highlighted (from top down): 132-1832, 206-446, 180-331, 106-417, 231-838 and 181-825.

Within the awe-inspiring, gaseous folds of Orion, researchers have identified two different types of discs around young and forming stars: those that lie close to the brightest star in the cluster (Theta 1 Orionis C) and those farther away from it. This bright star heats up the gas in the nearby discs, causing them to shine brightly. The discs that are farther away do not receive enough of the energetic radiation from the star to set the gas ablaze; thus, they can only be detected as a dark silhouette against the background of the bright nebula, as the dust that surrounds these discs absorbs background visible light. In these silhouetted discs, astronomers are better able to study the properties of the dust grains that are thought to bind together and possibly form planets like our own.

The brighter discs are indicated by a glowing cusp in the excited material and facing the bright star, but which we see at a random orientation within the nebula, so some appear edge on, and others face on, for instance. Other interesting features enhance the look of these captivating objects, such as emerging jets of matter and shock waves. The dramatic shock waves are formed when the stellar wind from the nearby massive star collides with the gas in the nebula, sculpting boomerang shapes or arrows or even, in the case of 181-825, a space jellyfish!”

Credit:

NASA, ESA, M. Robberto (Space Telescope Science Institute/ESA), the Hubble Space Telescope Orion Treasury Project Team and L. Ricci (ESO)

Something fun….Want a small scale LEGO version of the ATLAS detector? Then vote for it below.

A small scale version of the ATLAS detector can be made available as an official LEGO® product, but we need people to vote for it at LEGO Cuusoo. We need 10,000 votes to be considered by LEGO®.

Read more…

Something fun….

Want a small scale LEGO version of the ATLAS detector? Then vote for it below.

A small scale version of the ATLAS detector can be made available as an official LEGO® product, but we need people to vote for it at LEGO Cuusoo. We need 10,000 votes to be considered by LEGO®.

Read more…

Powers of Ten

An oldie but a goodie.


Powers of Ten takes us on an adventure in magnitudes. Starting at a picnic by the lakeside in Chicago, this famous film transports us to the outer edges of the universe. Every ten seconds we view the starting point from ten times farther out until our own galaxy is visible only a s a speck of light among many others. Returning to Earth with breathtaking speed, we move inward- into the hand of the sleeping picnicker- with ten times more magnification every ten seconds. Our journey ends inside a proton of a carbon atom within a DNA molecule in a white blood cell. POWERS OF TEN © 1977 EAMES OFFICE LLC (Available at www.eamesoffice.com)

thenewenlightenmentage:

What is Antimatter?

Antimatter sounds like the stuff of science fiction, but it’s very real. It is, however, elusive.
Antimatter particles are subatomic particles with properties opposite those of normal matter particles. So a positron (positively charged) is the antiparticle equivalent of the electron (negatively charged). When a particle and its antiparticle meet, they annihilate (are destroyed), releasing a lot of energy.
Antimatter particles are created in ultra high-speed collisions. There was a lot of it after the Big Bang. But today antimatter is rare.1

How rare is antimatter?  Lawrence Krauss puts it this way:

I like to say that while antimatter may seem strange, it is strange in the sense that Belgians are strange. They are not really strange; it is just that one rarely meets them.2

In the sentences before making that statement, Krauss tells us something interesting about antimatter:

Because antiparticles otherwise have the same properties as particles, a world made of antimatter would behave the same way as a world of matter, with antilovers sitting in anticars making love under an anti-Moon.  It is merely an accident of our circumstances, due, we think, to rather more profound factors…that we live in a universe that is made up of matter and not antimatter or one with equal amounts of both.3

That’s pretty awesome!  You might be wondering then, how can we know that this universe is made of matter and not antimatter?  If they behave the same way, how can we tell the difference?  Antimatter has an opposite charge and quantum spin4; those are the subtle differences that let us know that we live in a universe comprised of matter.  Well, there’s that and the possibility that it falls up.5
1 http://www.space.com/14721-antimatter-spacekids.html
2 Krauss, Lawrence. A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing. 1st ed. New York, NY: Free Press, 2012. 61-62. Print. 
3 Krauss, Lawrence. A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing. 1st ed. New York, NY: Free Press, 2012. 61. Print. 
4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
5 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130430113429.htm
GIF Courtesy: Watch Here

thenewenlightenmentage:

What is Antimatter?

Antimatter sounds like the stuff of science fiction, but it’s very real. It is, however, elusive.

Antimatter particles are subatomic particles with properties opposite those of normal matter particles. So a positron (positively charged) is the antiparticle equivalent of the electron (negatively charged). When a particle and its antiparticle meet, they annihilate (are destroyed), releasing a lot of energy.

Antimatter particles are created in ultra high-speed collisions. There was a lot of it after the Big Bang. But today antimatter is rare.1

How rare is antimatter?  Lawrence Krauss puts it this way:

I like to say that while antimatter may seem strange, it is strange in the sense that Belgians are strange. They are not really strange; it is just that one rarely meets them.2

In the sentences before making that statement, Krauss tells us something interesting about antimatter:

Because antiparticles otherwise have the same properties as particles, a world made of antimatter would behave the same way as a world of matter, with antilovers sitting in anticars making love under an anti-Moon.  It is merely an accident of our circumstances, due, we think, to rather more profound factors…that we live in a universe that is made up of matter and not antimatter or one with equal amounts of both.3

That’s pretty awesome!  You might be wondering then, how can we know that this universe is made of matter and not antimatter?  If they behave the same way, how can we tell the difference?  Antimatter has an opposite charge and quantum spin4; those are the subtle differences that let us know that we live in a universe comprised of matter.  Well, there’s that and the possibility that it falls up.5

http://www.space.com/14721-antimatter-spacekids.html

Krauss, Lawrence. A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing. 1st ed. New York, NY: Free Press, 2012. 61-62. Print.

Krauss, Lawrence. A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing. 1st ed. New York, NY: Free Press, 2012. 61. Print.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130430113429.htm

GIF Courtesy: Watch Here

thescienceofreality:

An Introduction to Black Holes.

Defined as “A dense, compact object whose gravitational pull is so strong that - within a certain distance of it - nothing can escape, not even light. Black holes are thought to result from the collapse of certain very massive stars at the ends of their evolution.”

Learn more about black holes here, and here. View images of black holes here.

I love Sarah Sze’s work, here are a couple photos from the Venice Biennale going on now.